A group of Colombians is set to organize a global protest against Chávez, aptly named “No More Chávez.” This is the same group that successfully conducted a similar protest in 2008 called “No More FARC,” targeting Colombia’s narcoterrorist group. There’s so much wrong with this event that I’ll provide a bit of context.
Colombia has a trade surplus with Venezuela that exceeds $7 billion annually. How many of today’s protesters have considered raising the issue with Colombian companies? More importantly, what are the chances that these companies will cease trading with Venezuela due to political matters? Colombian President Uribe possesses a pile of evidence that demonstrates, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Chávez supports, aids, and is complicit with FARC. Given that the organizers initially protested against FARC, how many of them are urging President Álvaro Uribe to use this evidence against Chávez once and for all, rather than withholding it in private deals as leverage? What real and tangible power does a Facebook collective hold to effect change within Venezuela? Similar to the Twitter users in Iran, perhaps? In light of the publication by Scottish/English authorities regarding the Lockerbie bomber based on oil/gas deals with the Libyan dictator, can anyone with a basic understanding of realpolitik view the event’s objectives as anything beyond a mere cathartic opportunity? Did those protesting in Trafalgar Square in London at least arrange an appearance at the Fourth Plinth?
No More Chávez is akin to No More Venezuela. Only those ignorant of our historical and contemporary idiosyncrasies could arrive at such an unattainable motto. The fight against Chávez will not be won by standing at the Fourth Plinth or delivering petitions to his Chilean minister at the OAS. That much is certain.